Teacher Resources: Lesson Plan
The Supreme Court's Rulings on Young People
Overview
In this lesson, students will focus on retrieving information from The Court and Young People Essay. To begin, ask students to look at the essay's first page to identify the five categories of cases involving young people. Divide students into teams and ask all members to read passages describing five cases: Western Union v. Lenroot; Pierce v. Society of Sisters; DeShaney v. Winnebago; in re Gault; and Minersville v. Gobitis. Students will use a graphic organizer to help them structure the information they find for each of these cases. As a culminating activity, each student will select one other case from the essay and graphically organize information about it.
National Curriculum Standards met by this lesson
For a list of standards that this unit addresses, click here.
Ties to your Curriculum
This lesson ties into Civics/U.S. Government when studying:
- The Constitution, Article III, the Judicial Branch
- The Supreme Court
- Rights and responsibilities of citizenship
Time required
The lesson will take approximately one to two class periods
Materials
- The U.S. Constitution, Preamble and Article III, Section 2
- Essay, The Supreme Court and Young People (link to essay)
- Graphic Organizer for The Supreme Court and the Lives of Young People (at the end of the lesson)
The Lesson
Anticipatory Set
- Ask students to read the Preamble to the Constitution to see if it refers to young people anywhere. If they are uncertain, ask them to look up the word "posterity."
- Next, ask students to look at Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution and ask them if it refers to young people when listing the types of cases the Supreme Court may rule upon.
- Explain that the essay, The Supreme Court and Young People (link to essay)has a great deal of information about Supreme Court cases which deal with young people, but because the amount of information is vast, they are going to look for main ideas first. Ask students to look at the first page to identify the five categories of cases involving young people. Next, identify and discuss the types of issues raised in each category. Could the cases have been organized in different categories?
Procedures
- Divide students into five teams based on the five essay categories, with each team to focus on one of the following court cases:
- Economic and Property Issues: Western Union v. Lenroot (1945)
- Parents and Family: Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)
- Health and Safety: DeShaney v. Winnebago (1989)
- Juveniles and Criminal Justice System: In re Gault (1967)
- Education and Students' Rights: Minersville v. Gobitis (1940)
- Direct each team to read the passage in the essay related to their assigned case and complete the graphic organizer to help them structure the information related to their case.
- When teams have completed the organizer, ask teams to select a reporter to share their findings with the class. After all teams have shared their cases, discuss whether the Supreme Court's impact on the lives of young people is surprisingly significant and diverse or whether it is what they had expected.
- As a culminating activity, each student will select one other case from the essay and individually complete the graphic organizer as homework.
Assessment
The students' graphic organizer may be evaluated on a twenty-point scale (which may be multiplied by five to convert to 100-point scale or for conversion to letter grades) using the following rubric:
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
None |
|
|
Factual information (5) |
(5) Complete and correct factual information about: Case Name Date Cause Decision |
(4) Correct factual information about: Case Name Date Cause Decision |
(3-2) Correct but incomplete information about: Case Name Date Cause Decision |
(1) Incorrect and incomplete information: Case Name Date Cause Decision |
(0) No attempt |
|
Case analysis (10) |
(10-9) Thorough, insightful analysis of: Youth involvement Constitutional issues Impact of case |
(8-7) Complete analysis of: Youth involvement Constitutional issues Impact of case |
(6-4) Limited analysis of: Youth involvement Constitutional issues Impact of case |
(3-1) Incomplete or incorrect analysis of: Youth involvement Constitutional issues Impact of case |
(0) No attempt |
|
Group Skills (5) |
Participates in project; shows courtesy and leadership Contributes to the group but does not monopolize it Displays courtesy |
Participates effectively and works cooperatively Displays courtesy |
Works apart without collaboration, but contributes Displays courtesy |
Contributes minimally Displays courtesy |
Does not participate or fails to cooperate with group effort or makes inappropriate remarks |
Related Works
Teachers and students may locate additional information in the case studies link at this website for In re Gault and Pierce v. Society of Sisters.
Western Union v. Lenroot
- FindLaw for Legal Professionals:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=323&invol=490
Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- FindLaw for Legal Professionals
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=268&invol=510 - Oyez Supreme Court Multimedia:
http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/305/ - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierce_v._Society_of_Sisters
DeShaney v. Winnebago
- FindLaw for Legal Professionals:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=489&invol=189 - Oyez Supreme Court Multimedia:
http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/634/ - Southern Methodist University, Dedham School of Law, Constitutional Law Web Tutorial:
http://www.law.smu.edu/firstday/con_law/brief.htm
In re Gault
- ABA Law Day for Schools, Lessons 7-9, Juvenile Justice: The Case of Gerry Gault:
http://www.abanet.org/publiced/lawday/schools/lessons/79_juvjustice.html - FindLaw for Legal Professionals
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=387&page=1 - Indiana State Library Close Up Essay: The Rights of Juvenile Offenders
http://www.statelib.lib.in.us/www/ihb/publications/cluprjo6.html - Landmark Cases--Expanding Criminal Rights: In re Gault and Argersinger v. Hamlin, Gideon v. Wainright :
http://www.landmarkcases.org/gideon/rights.html - Oyez Supreme Court Multimedia:
http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/181/
Minersville v. Gobitis
- American Treasures at the Library of Congress, A Matter of Conscience:
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/treasures/trr006.html - FindLaw for Legal Professionals:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=310&invol=586 - Oyez Supreme Court Multimedia:
http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/249/
Interdisciplinary Links
Computer: Starting with the information from their graphic organizers, students will create a computer slideshow about a case. They may look at other Internet sites for the opinions of the court. To illustrate the presentation, students should search for photographs of key figures involved in the case (whether one of the individuals involved in the case, lawyers, or participating justices), or images of locations involved in the site (of the Supreme Court, or a map of the town where the case started--one of the Brown v. Board of Education websites shows the path Linda Brown walked to school). They may wish to use the image section of a search engine to facilitate their search for visuals. The slide show may include a clip of audio files from oral arguments or interviews, if they are public domain.
Language Arts: Students may use information from the case they studied as the basis for a writing assignment, for example:
- Select a Court case with a dissenting opinion and pull quotes from the majority and dissenting opinion to create a poem in two voices.
- When a justice of the Supreme Court writes an opinion, the draft is circulated among other justices. Select one of the cases and write a note from the point of view of one the other participating justices who concurred or dissented.
- Create a newspaper account for one of the following: reporting the incident which started the case, describing the argument of the case before the Supreme Court, or covering the Supreme Court's announcement of the decision and the reaction of each side.
Graphic Organizer: The Supreme Court and Young People
Name(s): _______________________
|
Name of the Case |
|
|
Date the Case Was Decided |
|
|
Incident Which Caused the Case
|
|
|
How Young People were Involved
|
|
|
Constitutional Issue Involved in Case
|
|
|
Decision of the Court (including vote, if known)
|
|
|
Key Quote from the Case
|
|
|
Impact of the Decision
|
